On 09/04/2024 21:08, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > The IPQ9574 gen3x2 PHY is very similar to IPQ6018. It requires two > extra clocks named "anoc" and "snoc". Document this, and add a > new compatible string for this PHY. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml | 31 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml > index 634cec5d57ea..017ad65a9a3c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml > @@ -19,19 +19,22 @@ properties: > - qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy > - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-gen3-pcie-phy > - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy > + - qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy > > reg: > items: > - description: serdes > > clocks: > - maxItems: 3 > + minItems: 3 Which binding inspired you to such change? No, you need maxItems. See your previous patches here how it is done. > > clock-names: > items: > - const: aux > - const: cfg_ahb > - const: pipe > + - const: anoc > + - const: snoc OK, you did not test it. Neither this, nor DTS. I stop review, please test first. Best regards, Krzysztof