On 4/9/24 15:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 09/04/2024 21:08, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
IPQ9574 has PCIe controllers which are almost identical to IPQ6018.
The only difference is that the "iface" clock is not required.
Document this difference along with the compatible string.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
index cf9a6910b542..1915bea580d3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2
- qcom,pcie-ipq8074
- qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
+ - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
- qcom,pcie-msm8996
- qcom,pcie-qcs404
- qcom,pcie-sdm845
@@ -397,6 +398,37 @@ allOf:
- const: axi_m_sticky # AXI Master Sticky reset
- const: axi_s_sticky # AXI Slave Sticky reset
Where do you constrain the reg?
I didn't realize that was also required -- the make checks should have
picked this up too? I might be invoking the tests incorrectly.
I should add the ipq9574 in the same list as ipq8074-gen3 and ipq6018,
correct?
Alex