> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > In current driver, the counter will start firstly and then be configured. > > This sequence is not correct for AXI filter events since the correct > > AXI_MASK and AXI_ID are not set yet. Then the results may be inaccurate. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx> > > This one should be bug fix. Can you add fixes tag? Sure. Thanks, Xu Yang > > > > > --- > > Changes in v5: > > - new patch > > Changes in v6: > > - no changes > > Changes in v7: > > - no changes > > --- > > drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > > index 5537f4e07852..c99c43b214cb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > > +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > > @@ -523,12 +523,12 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags) > > hwc->idx = counter; > > hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED; > > > > - if (flags & PERF_EF_START) > > - ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags); > > - > > /* read trans, write trans, read beat */ > > imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2); > > > > + if (flags & PERF_EF_START) > > + ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >
