On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > In current driver, the counter will start firstly and then be configured. > This sequence is not correct for AXI filter events since the correct > AXI_MASK and AXI_ID are not set yet. Then the results may be inaccurate. > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx> This one should be bug fix. Can you add fixes tag? > > --- > Changes in v5: > - new patch > Changes in v6: > - no changes > Changes in v7: > - no changes > --- > drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > index 5537f4e07852..c99c43b214cb 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c > @@ -523,12 +523,12 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags) > hwc->idx = counter; > hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED; > > - if (flags & PERF_EF_START) > - ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags); > - > /* read trans, write trans, read beat */ > imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2); > > + if (flags & PERF_EF_START) > + ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.34.1 >