Hi Linus, On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:00:40 +0100 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 2:31 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking > > > > > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an > > > > > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess. > > > > > > > > Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally > > > > helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable. > > > > > > Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible > > > I guess. > > > > I think you offered creating the branch / tag in an earlier reply, > > that's less work for me so yes please! :) > > OK I fix! > > Just waiting for some final reviews to trickle in. > > Herve: nag me if it doesn't happen in time! As you tell me, this is my reminder. Best regards, Hervé > > > FWIW I usually put the branches / tags in my personal k.org tree. > > I don't wanna pollute the trees for the $many people who fetch > > netdev with random tags. > > Aha yeah pin control is relatively small so I just carry misc sync > tags there. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
