On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:41 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:26:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:03 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If this gets applied it'd be good to get a signed tag based off Linus' > > > tree so things that depend on it can be pulled into other trees (eg, the > > > ASoC mapping for the framer). > > > Do you mean my pin control tree or the big penguins tree? :D > > (I'm guessing mine.) > > I actually meant mainline there. Ah based off, not residing in. My bad. > > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking > > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an > > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess. > > Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally > helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable. Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible I guess. Yours, Linus Walleij
