On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 2:31 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking > > > > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an > > > > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess. > > > > > > Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally > > > helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable. > > > > Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible > > I guess. > > I think you offered creating the branch / tag in an earlier reply, > that's less work for me so yes please! :) OK I fix! Just waiting for some final reviews to trickle in. Herve: nag me if it doesn't happen in time! > FWIW I usually put the branches / tags in my personal k.org tree. > I don't wanna pollute the trees for the $many people who fetch > netdev with random tags. Aha yeah pin control is relatively small so I just carry misc sync tags there. Yours, Linus Walleij
