Hi Sakari, Thank you for the patch. On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Add fwnode_name_eq() to implement the functionality of of_node_name_eq() > on fwnode property API. The same convention of ending the comparison at > '@' (besides '\0') is applied on also both ACPI and swnode. The function > is intended for comparing unit address-less node names on DT and firmware > or swnodes compliant with DT bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > since v1: > > - Use str_has_prefix(). > > - Fix kernel-doc for @fwnode argument. > > - Use size_t type for len. > > The patch is untested. Not anymore :-) Which tree will this get merged through ? The thp7312 driver depends on this patch, and I would like to get it in v6.8. If we can merge this through the media tree it could be the simplest option, otherwise I'll need a stable branch based on v6.7-rc1. > drivers/base/property.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/property.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c > index 8c40abed7852..89a6e0833356 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/property.c > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c > @@ -594,6 +594,34 @@ const char *fwnode_get_name_prefix(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > return fwnode_call_ptr_op(fwnode, get_name_prefix); > } > > +/** > + * fwnode_name_eq - Return true if node name is equal > + * @fwnode: The firmware node > + * @name: The name to which to compare the node name > + * > + * Compare the name provided as an argument to the name of the node, stopping > + * the comparison to either '\0' or '@' character, whichever comes first. This > + * function is generally used for comparing node names while ignoring the > + * possible unit address of the node. > + * > + * Return: true if the node name matches with the name provided in the @name > + * argument, false otherwise. > + */ > +bool fwnode_name_eq(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *name) > +{ > + const char *node_name; > + size_t len; > + > + node_name = fwnode_get_name(fwnode); > + if (!node_name) > + return false; > + > + len = strchrnul(node_name, '@') - node_name; > + > + return str_has_prefix(node_name, name) == len; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_name_eq); > + > /** > * fwnode_get_parent - Return parent firwmare node > * @fwnode: Firmware whose parent is retrieved > diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h > index 083a1f41364b..096ade186601 100644 > --- a/include/linux/property.h > +++ b/include/linux/property.h > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_find_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > > const char *fwnode_get_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode); > const char *fwnode_get_name_prefix(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode); > +bool fwnode_name_eq(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *name); > > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_parent(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode); > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_next_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart