On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:11, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > When an CPU's performance domain is managed through the SCMI firmware, > > > let's enable us describe this as a consumer of a power-domain provider, > > > which is the de-facto standard to use for performance domains. In this > > > case, let's specify a corresponding power-domain-name, to point out the > > > corresponding index for it. > > > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - New patch. > > > > This patch and 10/13 are quite generic. I am happy to take it as part of > > this series but just thought of checking again if that is what you prefer ? > > Yes please, go ahead and pick this up through your scmi tree. > Thanks, I just need Viresh's ack for cpufreq changes, we are otherwise all set with the series. I will pull once I have his ack. -- Regards, Sudeep
