On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:11, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > When an CPU's performance domain is managed through the SCMI firmware, > > let's enable us describe this as a consumer of a power-domain provider, > > which is the de-facto standard to use for performance domains. In this > > case, let's specify a corresponding power-domain-name, to point out the > > corresponding index for it. > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v3: > > - New patch. > > This patch and 10/13 are quite generic. I am happy to take it as part of > this series but just thought of checking again if that is what you prefer ? Yes please, go ahead and pick this up through your scmi tree. Kind regards Uffe
