On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > When an CPU's performance domain is managed through the SCMI firmware, > let's enable us describe this as a consumer of a power-domain provider, > which is the de-facto standard to use for performance domains. In this > case, let's specify a corresponding power-domain-name, to point out the > corresponding index for it. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes in v3: > - New patch. This patch and 10/13 are quite generic. I am happy to take it as part of this series but just thought of checking again if that is what you prefer ? -- Regards, Sudeep
