On 11/09/2023 08:46, Macpaul Lin wrote: > On 9/11/23 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> >> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you >> have verified the sender or the content. >> >> On 10/09/2023 14:23, Macpaul Lin wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 9/10/23 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> External email : Please do nost click links or open attachments until you >>>> have verified the sender or the content. >>>> >>>> On 09/09/2023 15:28, Macpaul Lin wrote: >>>>> 1. Add compatible for MT8395. >>>>> 2. Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board, also known >>>>> as the "Genio 1200-EVK". >>>>> >>>>> The MT8195 and MT8395 belong to the same SoC family, >>>>> with only minor differences in their physical characteristics. >>>>> They utilize unique efuse values for differentiation. >>>>> >>>>> The booting process and configurations are managed by boot >>>>> loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Consequently, the part numbers >>>>> and procurement channels vary. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Changes for v4: >>> Changes for v5: >>> - No change, update Reviewed-by tag only. Thanks. >>> >>> The explanation is here. The version v4 and v5 are the same. >>> For sending v5 is because "Patch v5 2/2" has been updated and these 2 >>> patches were in the same patch set. I think to update the whole patch >>> set together with a single modified patch should be a usual operation. >>> Did I miss anything? >> >> Yeah, like not top-posting. >> >> Why do you change the same line in other patchset? > > Hmm, they are different patch actually. That's what I wrote. "Other patchset" == "different patch". > I've tested the patch v5 here can be applied with / without mt8365's > description patch independently. That's not the answer to my question. I asked "Why". I have troubles getting any answers here, so let's be clear - this or the other patch is just wrong. Best regards, Krzysztof
