On 10/09/2023 14:23, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > On 9/10/23 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> >> External email : Please do nost click links or open attachments until you >> have verified the sender or the content. >> >> On 09/09/2023 15:28, Macpaul Lin wrote: >>> 1. Add compatible for MT8395. >>> 2. Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board, also known >>> as the "Genio 1200-EVK". >>> >>> The MT8195 and MT8395 belong to the same SoC family, >>> with only minor differences in their physical characteristics. >>> They utilize unique efuse values for differentiation. >>> >>> The booting process and configurations are managed by boot >>> loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Consequently, the part numbers >>> and procurement channels vary. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Changes for v4: > Changes for v5: > - No change, update Reviewed-by tag only. Thanks. > > The explanation is here. The version v4 and v5 are the same. > For sending v5 is because "Patch v5 2/2" has been updated and these 2 > patches were in the same patch set. I think to update the whole patch > set together with a single modified patch should be a usual operation. > Did I miss anything? Yeah, like not top-posting. Why do you change the same line in other patchset? > >> Confusing. You just sent a patch changing the same hunk - adding >> description, without any explanation. >> > > The marketing naming rule of MediaTek SOCs are usually confusing people. > I guess the previous patch just confused you. Ha. ? Best regards, Krzysztof
