On 11/09/2023 08:34, Macpaul Lin wrote: > On 9/11/23 14:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> >> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you >> have verified the sender or the content. >> >> On 10/09/2023 14:07, Macpaul Lin wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 9/10/23 17:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> + - description: MediaTek Genio 350 Boards (Genio 350 EVK) >>>> >>>> That's a bit confusing. So all of the boards here will be Genio 350 EVK? >>>> I don't get what is the point of this description. >>>> >>>> >>>>> + items: >>>>> - enum: >>>>> - mediatek,mt8365-evk >>>>> - const: mediatek,mt8365 >>> >>> Thes boards with compatible 'mediatek,mt8365-evk' is indeed used by >> >> Boards? > > I'm not sure if there will be more hardware version released to market. > Current the p1v3 is the final version of mt8365-evk. Then your code (enum) does not match description. The code is saying: this is for multiple boards based on mt8365. Your description is saying: this is only for 350 boards. Now your email is saying: there is only one 350 board. Three different versions. Sorry, I am confused. > >>> Genio 350-EVK, which Baylibre helped to do upstream tasks. The only >>> production version of hardware will be available on the market. The >>> derived version of customer's hardware is not available yet. >>> >>> The separate patch for renaming mt8365-evk.dts file should be send next >>> week for aligning the naming rules. >> >> So the description is not correct. >> >> Anyway, this patch does not make much sense to me considering nothing >> like this was merged. You just sent v5 doing the same! > > > Sorry I'm confused now. > These are independent patches. > This patch is for SOC mt83'6'5 and board mt8365-evk, which is not relate > SOC mt83'9'5 and board mt8395-evk. OK, I see my confusion. mt8365 and mt8395. Still the description is not matching the code, at least to my limited understanding of the description. Best regards, Krzysztof
