On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:56:16PM +0800, Xingyu Wu wrote: > On 2023/5/12 17:35, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:07:47PM +0800, Xingyu Wu wrote: > >> On 2023/5/12 14:47, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:20:32AM +0800, Xingyu Wu wrote: > >> >> Add PLL clock inputs from PLL clock generator. > >> >> > >> >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> .../clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++++-- > >> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > /tmp/tmp.KDlzwQM5ma/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2-v1.3b.dtb: clock-controller@13020000: clocks: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > >> > [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]] is too short > >> > From schema: /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml > >> > /tmp/tmp.KDlzwQM5ma/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2-v1.3b.dtb: clock-controller@13020000: clock-names: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > >> > ['osc', 'gmac1_rmii_refin', 'gmac1_rgmii_rxin', 'i2stx_bclk_ext', 'i2stx_lrck_ext', 'i2srx_bclk_ext', 'i2srx_lrck_ext', 'tdm_ext', 'mclk_ext'] is too short > >> > 'i2stx_bclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2stx_lrck_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2srx_bclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2srx_lrck_ext' was expected > >> > 'tdm_ext' was expected > >> > 'mclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'pll0_out' was expected > >> > From schema: /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml > >> > /tmp/tmp.KDlzwQM5ma/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2-v1.2a.dtb: clock-controller@13020000: clocks: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > >> > [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]] is too short > >> > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml > >> > /tmp/tmp.KDlzwQM5ma/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2-v1.2a.dtb: clock-controller@13020000: clock-names: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > >> > ['osc', 'gmac1_rmii_refin', 'gmac1_rgmii_rxin', 'i2stx_bclk_ext', 'i2stx_lrck_ext', 'i2srx_bclk_ext', 'i2srx_lrck_ext', 'tdm_ext', 'mclk_ext'] is too short > >> > 'i2stx_bclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2stx_lrck_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2srx_bclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'i2srx_lrck_ext' was expected > >> > 'tdm_ext' was expected > >> > 'mclk_ext' was expected > >> > 'pll0_out' was expected > >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml > >> > > >> > This binding change is incompatible with the existing devicetrees for > >> > the visionfive 2. > >> > >> This looks like less clocks about PLL in SYSCRG node. And I add this in patch 7. > > > > The existing devicetree is a valid, albeit limited, description of the > > hardware. > > After your changes to the clock driver in this series, but *without* the > > changes to the devicetrees, does the system still function? > > From a quick check of 4/7, it looks like it will not? > > I just tested it on the board and the system still worked without the changes > about devicetree. But these clocks' rate were 0 because these could not get > the PLL clocks from devicetree. Hmm, that sounds like an issue to me. If all of the clock rates are computed based off of parents that incorrectly report 0, are we not in for trouble? Should the fixed-factor clocks be retained as a fallback for the sake of compatibility? Emil, Stephen?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
