On 22:46-20230328, Roger Quadros wrote: [...] > >>> How about sk-lp ? > >> > >> moved it to sk-lp. see above in this patch. > >> > > > > A bit confused. Looking at [1] vs [2], it seems to indicate pd controller at > > 0x3f as well? Am I misreading the schematics? > > > > [1] https://www.ti.com/tool/SK-AM62-LP#design-files > > [2] https://www.ti.com/tool/SK-AM62#design-files > > Yes PD controller is at 0x3f for both boards but IRQ is not routed on AM62-LP. > I tried to explain this the cover letter. ;) > > Pasting here for convenience. > > > Although k3-am625-lp-sk USB is exactly the same as on k3-am625-sk, > > it is missing the IRQ line from Type-C chip which is currently > > required as per chip's DT binding. So we don't add Type-C support > > for k3-am625-lp-sk till h/w is fixed or polling mode support for > > Type-C chip is accepted [2] > > > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230324133741.43408-1-rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx/T/ Thanks, This thread does seem to be progressing? Since LP-SK is already in production, it might do good to hold on to this series a little longer instead of shuttling dts nodes back and forth. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D