On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:44:49AM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 2/1/23 21:33, Stefan Wahren wrote: > > > Since the imx28 belongs to the early ARM platforms which has been > > > adapted to DT, a lot of these DTS files are not in the best shape. > > > So this series tries to address this by using label references > > > and SPDX tags. > > > > > > Theses patches doesn't include functional changes. The resulting > > > DTB files has been verified with dtdiff. > > > > > > Stefan Wahren (9): > > > ARM: dts: imx28-apf28: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-m28/sps1: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-apx4devkit: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-cfa10036: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-duckbill: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-duckbill-2: Include base board > > > ARM: dts: imx28-evk: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-ts4600: Convert to use label references > > > ARM: dts: imx28-tx28: add SPDX-License-Identifier > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28.dts | 96 ++-- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 312 ++++++------ > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apx4devkit.dts | 380 +++++++------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10036.dts | 193 ++++---- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 454 +++++++++-------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10055.dts | 224 +++++---- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10056.dts | 146 +++--- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10057.dts | 252 +++++----- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10058.dts | 186 ++++--- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-485.dts | 174 +------ > > > .../arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-enocean.dts | 198 +------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-spi.dts | 211 ++------ > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2.dts | 256 +++++----- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill.dts | 196 ++++---- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 462 +++++++++--------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28.dtsi | 44 +- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28cu3.dts | 354 +++++++------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28evk.dts | 420 ++++++++-------- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-sps1.dts | 201 ++++---- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600.dts | 80 ++- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 38 +- > > > 21 files changed, 2142 insertions(+), 2735 deletions(-) > > > > > > > FYI, such changes have been rejected years ago: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20140512141814.GE8330@dragon/ > > I hope the attitude has changed here in the last years. Device trees > with label references are so much easier to read and to maintain. Ok, I'm flexible on this. Considering Krzysztof has been doing the same for other platforms, I guess arm-soc folks changed their thoughts. Shawn
