Hello, On 2/1/23 21:33, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Since the imx28 belongs to the early ARM platforms which has been adapted to DT, a lot of these DTS files are not in the best shape. So this series tries to address this by using label references and SPDX tags. Theses patches doesn't include functional changes. The resulting DTB files has been verified with dtdiff. Stefan Wahren (9): ARM: dts: imx28-apf28: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-m28/sps1: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-apx4devkit: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-cfa10036: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-duckbill: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-duckbill-2: Include base board ARM: dts: imx28-evk: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-ts4600: Convert to use label references ARM: dts: imx28-tx28: add SPDX-License-Identifier arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28.dts | 96 ++-- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 312 ++++++------ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apx4devkit.dts | 380 +++++++------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10036.dts | 193 ++++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 454 +++++++++-------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10055.dts | 224 +++++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10056.dts | 146 +++--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10057.dts | 252 +++++----- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10058.dts | 186 ++++--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-485.dts | 174 +------ .../arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-enocean.dts | 198 +------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2-spi.dts | 211 ++------ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill-2.dts | 256 +++++----- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-duckbill.dts | 196 ++++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 462 +++++++++--------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28.dtsi | 44 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28cu3.dts | 354 +++++++------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-m28evk.dts | 420 ++++++++-------- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-sps1.dts | 201 ++++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600.dts | 80 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 38 +- 21 files changed, 2142 insertions(+), 2735 deletions(-)
FYI, such changes have been rejected years ago: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20140512141814.GE8330@dragon/ Regards, -- Sébastien Szymanski, Armadeus Systems Software engineer