Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add TQ-Systems LS1021A board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/01/2023 09:58, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2023, 17:59:20 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 19/01/2023 15:42, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>> From: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> TQMLS102xA is a SOM family using NXP LS1021A CPU family.
>>> MBLS102xA is an evaluation mainbord for this SOM.
>>
>> typo: mainboard
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml index
>>> 3ba354578e8f9..b54a920934c9d 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>
>>> @@ -1164,6 +1164,13 @@ properties:
>>>                - fsl,ls1021a-twr
>>>            
>>>            - const: fsl,ls1021a
>>>
>>> +      - description: TQ-Systems TQMLS1021A SoM on MBLS102xA board
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls102xa
>>
>> Can mbls102xa come with something else than tqmls1021a?
> 
> I don't expect this. MBLS102xa is the starterkit carrier board for TQMLS1021A 
> module. But the module can come on other custom carrier boards.
> This name schema is similar to e.g. imx8mp-tqma8mpql-mba8mpxl.dts

If mbls102xa has soldered module, I would drop some part of it. It's
really redundant. If it is a SoM, so module could be replaced, then it
would make sense.

> 
>>> +          - const: tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a
>>
>> Why duplicating ls1021a? Can tqmls1021a come with something else? This
>> is redundant.
> 
> I agree this is somewhat redundant, but this follows the naming scheme 
> '<vendor>,<soc>-<module>' which is rather widespread for i.MX boards/modules. 
> TQMLS1021A is the module name I can't change, actually part of the series 
> TQMLS102xA.

Ah, you're right... the double ls1021a is a bit confusing but that's
indeed common pattern.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux