Hi Krzysztof, thanks for your feedback. Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2023, 17:59:20 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 19/01/2023 15:42, Alexander Stein wrote: > > From: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > TQMLS102xA is a SOM family using NXP LS1021A CPU family. > > MBLS102xA is an evaluation mainbord for this SOM. > > typo: mainboard Thanks. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml index > > 3ba354578e8f9..b54a920934c9d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > @@ -1164,6 +1164,13 @@ properties: > > - fsl,ls1021a-twr > > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a > > > > + - description: TQ-Systems TQMLS1021A SoM on MBLS102xA board > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls102xa > > Can mbls102xa come with something else than tqmls1021a? I don't expect this. MBLS102xa is the starterkit carrier board for TQMLS1021A module. But the module can come on other custom carrier boards. This name schema is similar to e.g. imx8mp-tqma8mpql-mba8mpxl.dts > > + - const: tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a > > Why duplicating ls1021a? Can tqmls1021a come with something else? This > is redundant. I agree this is somewhat redundant, but this follows the naming scheme '<vendor>,<soc>-<module>' which is rather widespread for i.MX boards/modules. TQMLS1021A is the module name I can't change, actually part of the series TQMLS102xA. > > + - const: fsl,ls1021a > > + > > > > - description: LS1028A based Boards > > > > items: > > - enum: > Best regards, > Krzysztof Best regards, Alexander
