On 19/01/2023 15:42, Alexander Stein wrote: > From: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > TQMLS102xA is a SOM family using NXP LS1021A CPU family. > MBLS102xA is an evaluation mainbord for this SOM. typo: mainboard > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > index 3ba354578e8f9..b54a920934c9d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > @@ -1164,6 +1164,13 @@ properties: > - fsl,ls1021a-twr > - const: fsl,ls1021a > > + - description: TQ-Systems TQMLS1021A SoM on MBLS102xA board > + items: > + - enum: > + - tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls102xa Can mbls102xa come with something else than tqmls1021a? > + - const: tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a Why duplicating ls1021a? Can tqmls1021a come with something else? This is redundant. > + - const: fsl,ls1021a > + > - description: LS1028A based Boards > items: > - enum: Best regards, Krzysztof
