On 04/12/2022 19:25, Vincent Knecht wrote:
Le dimanche 04 décembre 2022 à 19:42 +0100, Vincent Knecht a écrit :
Le dimanche 04 décembre 2022 à 07:59 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov a écrit :
There is no dtsi file for msm8939 in the kernel sources. Drop the
compatibility with unofficial dtsi and remove support for handling the
single-cell calibration data on msm8939.
Could one invoke a "msm8916-like exemption" here ?
Ignore that, guess we'll just have to implement it like there:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221204055909.1351895-9-dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m19cffb13114b6f4f153058e3e7a1943251acaf81
Also, msm8939.dtsi was submitted once [1],
and if helps we could send a v2 this month...
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220419010903.3109514-1-bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx/
Offer still stands, the current community one is here:
https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/linux/blob/msm8916/6.1-rc7/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939.dtsi
heh - here's my current
https://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/qualcomm/kernel.git/log/?h=tracking-qcomlt-msm8939
I've been working on clearing out blockages in legacy yaml conversions
phy
mdss-dsi-ctrl
which thrown up errors on 8939
I took a good bunch of feedback from the list for v1 into that dtsi -
there's not much left blocking v2.
I'll see if I can get that out this week
---
bod
