Le dimanche 04 décembre 2022 à 19:42 +0100, Vincent Knecht a écrit : > Le dimanche 04 décembre 2022 à 07:59 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov a écrit : > > There is no dtsi file for msm8939 in the kernel sources. Drop the > > compatibility with unofficial dtsi and remove support for handling the > > single-cell calibration data on msm8939. > > Could one invoke a "msm8916-like exemption" here ? Ignore that, guess we'll just have to implement it like there: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221204055909.1351895-9-dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m19cffb13114b6f4f153058e3e7a1943251acaf81 > Also, msm8939.dtsi was submitted once [1], > and if helps we could send a v2 this month... > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220419010903.3109514-1-bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx/ Offer still stands, the current community one is here: https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/linux/blob/msm8916/6.1-rc7/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939.dtsi
