On 19/09/2022 11:56, Jianguo Zhang wrote: >> No, this does not justify new entry. You need specific compatible, >> but >> not new entry. >> >>> On the other hand, mt8188 and mt8195 have same ethernet design, so >>> the >>> private data "mt8195_gmac_variant" can be resued to reduce >>> redundant >>> info in driver. >> >> And you do not need new entry in the driver. > Do you mean that I can use "mediatek,mt8195-gmac" as compatible for > ethernet in mt8188 DTS file? Yes, as a fallback. Example schema describes such case. Best regards, Krzysztof
