On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:00:35PM +0000, John Garry wrote: > On 07/12/2021 13:59, Leo Yan wrote: > > > Whether other implementers might retroactively define "equivalent" IIDR > > > values for their existing implementations in a way we could potentially > > > quirk in the driver is an orthogonal question. > > Agreed, it makes sense that supports the standard IP modules in > > the mainline kernel at this stage. > > > > Thanks for explanation. > > Leo, if you really want this to work on D06, I could also hack some > out-of-tree perf tool patches for you. I'm not sure if you're interested in > that. Let me know. No, please don't spend time on this. I just use D06 platform to verify SMMUv3 relevant patches, but have no requirement for profiling SMMUv3 on it. Anyway, thanks a lot! Leo
