Hi Kieran,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:40 PM Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The thermal sensor bindings were not matched correctly against the
> expected naming scheme.
>
> r8a77980.dtsi also used a different naming scheme compared to the other
> related platforms.
It lacked the labels, which you added for consistency.
Is there any point in providing them, as there are no users? Or should
they be removed instead?
> This series cleans up the dtsi files for the CPU target thermal sensors,
> allowing the validation to run.
>
> Enabling this validation shows up a new validation failure:
>
> linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77951-ulcb-kf.dt.yaml: thermal-zones: sensor3-thermal:cooling-maps:map0:contribution:0:0: 1024 is greater than the maximum of 100
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-zones.yaml
>
> This validation error appears to be pervasive across all of these
> bindings, but changing that will be more invasive and require someone to
> perform dedicated testing with the thermal drivers to ensure that the
> updates to the ranges do not cause unexpected side effects.
Niklas?
> Kieran Bingham (9):
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a774a1: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a774b1: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a774e1: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77951: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77960: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77961: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77965: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: Fix thermal bindings
> arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779a0: Fix thermal bindings
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
