On 03.11.2021 16:11, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
It's required to properly describe boards without connected WP pin (e.g.
Asus GT-AC5300).
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
index dd5a64969e37..49c7860c0dad 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ properties:
earlier versions of this core that include WP
type: boolean
+ no-wp:
+ description:
+ This property marks boards with WP pin not connected to the NAND chip.
+ type: boolean
I started rethinking this. Since we already hav "brcm,nand-has-wp"
(boolean), would makes more sense:
1. Add "no-wp" boolean (as proposed in this patch)
2. Add "wp" (or similar) with [0, 1] and deprecate "brcm,nand-has-wp"
