Hi Conor,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add mpfs-soc to clear undocumented binding warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml
> index 3f981e897126..1ff7a5224bbc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit
> - const: microchip,mpfs
> + - const: microchip,mpfs-soc
Doesn't the "s" in "mpfs" already stand for "soc"?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
