On 01-09-20, 04:58, Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie wrote: > > > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,keembay-emmc- > > phy.yaml#" > > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"; > > > + > > > +title: Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings > > > > This seems same as > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-emmc-phy.yaml, why > > not add a new compatible in lgm binding, or did I miss a difference? > > AFAIK, LGM make use of syscon node, whilst KMB does not. > And LGM and KMB belongs to different SoC family. So, I prefer them to > be in separate file. > > Having said that, with few changes in wordings in title and description, > I think we can make it generic and can be used across few products. The bindings seems quite similar. We can have two drivers loaded using two compatible but binding description can be made same -- ~Vinod
