On 21-08-20, 19:37, Wan Ahmad Zainie wrote: > Binding description for Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY. > > Signed-off-by: Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..4cbbd3887c13 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml#" > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" > + > +title: Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings This seems same as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-emmc-phy.yaml, why not add a new compatible in lgm binding, or did I miss a difference? > + > +maintainers: > + - Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@xxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: intel,keembay-emmc-phy > + > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + clocks: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + clock-names: > + items: > + - const: emmcclk > + > + "#phy-cells": > + const: 0 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - "#phy-cells" > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + phy@20290000 { > + compatible = "intel,keembay-emmc-phy"; > + reg = <0x20290000 0x54>; > + clocks = <&emmc>; > + clock-names = "emmcclk"; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > + }; > -- > 2.17.1 -- ~Vinod