On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:55:01PM +0000, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On 11/01/2019 04:58 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > >>> Add MTD support for w25q256jw SPI NOR chip from Winbond. This chip > >>> supports dual/quad I/O mode with 512 blocks of memory organized in > >>> 64KB sectors. In addition to this, there is also small 4KB sectors > >>> available for flexibility. The device has been validated using Thor96 > >>> board. > >>> > >>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > >>> Cc: linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Signed-off-by: Darshak Patel <darshak.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> [Mani: cleaned up for upstream] > >> Can we keep Darshak's authorship? We usually change the author if we feel that > >> we made a significant change to what was originally published. > >> > >> If it's just about cosmetics, cleaning or rebase, you can specify what you did > >> after the author's S-o-b tag and then add your S-o-b, as you did above. > >> > > I'd suggest to keep Darshak's authorship since he did the actual change in > > the bsp. I have to clean it up before submitting upstream and I mentioned > > the same above. > > > > Ok, I'll amend the author when applying, it will be Darshak. > Ah no. I was saying we should keep both of ours authorship. It shouldn't be an issue because we both are involved in the process. Thanks, Mani > Thanks, > ta