On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:00:44 +0000 Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:44:57 > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:33 +0200 > > Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The I3C devices described in DT might not be attached to the master which > > > doesn't allow to assign a specific dynamic address. > > > > I remember testing this when developing the framework, so, unless > > another patch regressed it, it should already work. I suspect patch 1 > > is actually the regressing this use case. > > For today it doesn't address the case where the device is described with > static address = 0, which isn't attached to the controller. Hm, I'm pretty sure I had designed the code to support that case (see [1]). It might be buggy, but nothing we can't fix I guess.
