Hi Neil, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 01/17/2017 10:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>> The ARM Mali Utgard GPU family is embedded into a number of SoCs from > >>> Allwinner, Amlogic, Mediatek or Rockchip. > >>> > >>> Add a binding for the GPU of that family. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) > >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > >> > >> Do you have a driver in kernel which will implement these bindings? > > > > No, but we have bindings for out-of-tree drivers already. > > > >> Defining them for out-of-tree driver does not bring any benefits > >> (3rd party driver will not respect them anyway). > > > > You could see it the other way around too. The out-of-tree drivers > > don't respect it at the moment because there's no binding to respect. > > > > And at least for us, we definitely plan on doing that. > > > > Maxime > > Hi Maxime, Krzysztof, > > We hope this will be accepted so it will solve the same issue we > have on Amlogic SoCs and all the other mali powered SoCs. Do you have any requirements (or weird case) that is not covered by the current doc? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
