On 01/19/2017 04:51 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 01/17/2017 10:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>>>> The ARM Mali Utgard GPU family is embedded into a number of SoCs from >>>>> Allwinner, Amlogic, Mediatek or Rockchip. >>>>> >>>>> Add a binding for the GPU of that family. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt >>>> >>>> Do you have a driver in kernel which will implement these bindings? >>> >>> No, but we have bindings for out-of-tree drivers already. >>> >>>> Defining them for out-of-tree driver does not bring any benefits >>>> (3rd party driver will not respect them anyway). >>> >>> You could see it the other way around too. The out-of-tree drivers >>> don't respect it at the moment because there's no binding to respect. >>> >>> And at least for us, we definitely plan on doing that. >>> >>> Maxime >> >> Hi Maxime, Krzysztof, >> >> We hope this will be accepted so it will solve the same issue we >> have on Amlogic SoCs and all the other mali powered SoCs. > > Do you have any requirements (or weird case) that is not covered by > the current doc? > > Thanks, > Maxime > Hi Maxime, Apart the GPU DVFS, all is covered by the current doc for the Amlogic Meson GXBB and GXL SoCs. Neil
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
