* Franklin S Cooper Jr. <fcooper@xxxxxx> [160317 08:55]:
>
>
> On 03/17/2016 10:11 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:23:44PM -0600, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> >> From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation
> >> for dt bindings.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> >> [fcooper@xxxxxx: Add eCAP and use updated bindings for PWMSS and ePWM]
> >> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@xxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Version 5 changes:
> >> Add DT node for eCAP and update eCAP binding documentation
> >>
> >> Version 4 changes:
> >> Updated link to the latest documentation
> >>
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 9 +++
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt | 9 +++
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt | 15 +++-
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >> + ehrpwm1: pwm@48440200 {
> >> + compatible = "ti,dra7xx-ehrpwm",
> >> + "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
> >> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >> + reg = <0x48440200 0x80>;
> >> + clocks = <&ehrpwm1_tbclk>;
> >> + clock-names = "tbclk";
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + ecap1: ecap@48440100 {
> > This also is a PWM? Then it should also be pwm@...
>
> The enhanced capture module primary purpose is to measure
> time between external signals which is called capture mode.
> It also has a PWM mode. So I wouldn't recommend generalizing
> the entire node to pwm.
So is this patch safe for me to apply now or do we need more
changes?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
