On 04/11/2016 03:21 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Franklin S Cooper Jr. <fcooper@xxxxxx> [160317 08:55]:
>>
>>
>> On 03/17/2016 10:11 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:23:44PM -0600, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>>>> From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation
>>>> for dt bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
>>>> [fcooper@xxxxxx: Add eCAP and use updated bindings for PWMSS and ePWM]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@xxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> Version 5 changes:
>>>> Add DT node for eCAP and update eCAP binding documentation
>>>>
>>>> Version 4 changes:
>>>> Updated link to the latest documentation
>>>>
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 9 +++
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt | 9 +++
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt | 15 +++-
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>>> + ehrpwm1: pwm@48440200 {
>>>> + compatible = "ti,dra7xx-ehrpwm",
>>>> + "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>>>> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
>>>> + reg = <0x48440200 0x80>;
>>>> + clocks = <&ehrpwm1_tbclk>;
>>>> + clock-names = "tbclk";
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + ecap1: ecap@48440100 {
>>> This also is a PWM? Then it should also be pwm@...
>>
>> The enhanced capture module primary purpose is to measure
>> time between external signals which is called capture mode.
>> It also has a PWM mode. So I wouldn't recommend generalizing
>> the entire node to pwm.
>
> So is this patch safe for me to apply now or do we need more
> changes?
No. This patch will change based on changes I will make to handle patch
1 comments. I will send a new rev.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
