Hi Krzysztof, On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof, >> >> This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag >> from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10. >> >> If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set? > > I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I > assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This > means that: > 1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation) > go to Myungjoo, > 2. I can pick DTS changes. Yes. > > But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied > by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in > these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from > Rob, you will rework them, right? I already discussed the Rob's question on December, last year on patchset[1]. But, after that, I didn't receive the any reply from him. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/943 So, I thought that there is no comment. But, today, he give some question after 4 months. But I'll again reply to Rob's question. > > Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get > DT-guys ack first. OK. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
