On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof, > > This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag > from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10. > > If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set? I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This means that: 1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation) go to Myungjoo, 2. I can pick DTS changes. But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from Rob, you will rework them, right? Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get DT-guys ack first. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
