On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO >> <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas >>> >>> I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the >>> tx timeout. >>> >>> The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to >>> fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (Andreas' comment). >>> >>> So, supposing the probe is ok and phy is connected, >>> I need your input ... >>> >>> Tomeu: after revering the 0e80bdc9a72d (stmmac: first frame >>> prep at the end of xmit routine) the network is >>> not stable and there is a timeout after a while. >>> The box has 3.50 with normal desc settings. >>> >>> Dinh: the network is ok, I wonder if you can share a boot >>> log just to understand if the normal or enhanced >>> descriptors are used. >>> >> >> Here it is: > > ... >> >> [ 0.850523] stmmac - user ID: 0x10, Synopsys ID: 0x37 >> [ 0.855570] Ring mode enabled >> [ 0.858611] DMA HW capability register supported >> [ 0.863128] Enhanced/Alternate descriptors >> [ 0.867482] Enabled extended descriptors >> [ 0.871482] RX Checksum Offload Engine supported (type 2) >> [ 0.876948] TX Checksum insertion supported >> [ 0.881204] Enable RX Mitigation via HW Watchdog Timer >> [ 0.886863] socfpga-dwmac ff702000.ethernet eth0: No MDIO subnode found >> [ 0.899090] libphy: stmmac: probed >> [ 0.902484] eth0: PHY ID 00221611 at 4 IRQ POLL (stmmac-0:04) active > > > Thx Dinh, so you are using the Enhanced/Alternate descriptors > I am debugging on my side on a setup with normal descriptors, I let you > know > Doesn't the printout "Enhanced/Alternate descriptors" mean that I'm using Enhanced/Alternate descriptors? Dinh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
