Hello Andreas, Heiko,
On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
PHY:
libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
snps,phy-addr is not correct. Can you check it?
In the stmmac_mdio if this is not passed as parameter the bus should
be scanned and the first IDs found should select the right address.
I suppose in your box there is a real transceiver, so maybe the patch
from Gabriel is not actually necessary.
eth0: Could not attach to PHY
stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmmac maintainers.
peppe
do you remember from what revision you rebased away from, when it was still
working (as a known-good state)?
Hm, next-20160111 possibly... leaving all the 5 days and 4 days ago
changes as candidates ("stmmac: share reset function between dwmac100
and dwmac1000" .. "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression").
Regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
