On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:19:56PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > While I agree that many of these screwups shouldn't have happened in the > first place, it's nothing that we were prepared for two years ago. At > some point everyone agreed that DT was the way forward, so DT is what we > did. Nobody said anything about stable ABI back then, so nobody cared. The idea of a device tree has not changed. I guess the arm crowd jumped on the DT bandwagon with no clue what it was about. > We treated DT the same way we had treated platform data before, which > has inevitable lead to the current mess, which is only slightly better > than what we used to have. So, are you saying that arm/dt is a failure? (I won't argue with you on that point.) Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
