On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > We treated DT the same way we had treated platform data before, which > has inevitable lead to the current mess, which is only slightly better > than what we used to have. Side question, in your point of view, how is that better ? current DT tools are not able to validate a file wrt its schema, so for now we just moved platdata to DTS files and lost compiler type checking in between. I respectfully understand people fighting for *stable* DT because I see the benefits behind this, even if IMO they absolutely do not outweigh the pain. But I fail to see any benefits of "forever unstable" DT, if you have to tie the kernel tree with a DTB file, the description could have been left in C code. -- Maxime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
