> > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 14:23 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > my point > > before DT scenario for my hw crypto driver example: Note that you are not describing a normal "DT scenario" here. You are describing a case in which we screwed up and allowed non-invariant features of the hardware to be left out of the DT schema for the device in question - apparently because the Linux driver at the time didn't happen to use them yet. That was a fundamental mistake and should not have happened that way. So yes, after the public flogging has happened, and we're trying to work out how best to cope with the screwup, we don't necessarily have any perfect choices. The perfect choice was to do it properly in the first place. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
