Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:05:58PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 13:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> >
>> >> Note that you are not describing a normal "DT scenario" here. You are
>> >> describing a case in which we screwed up
>> >
>> > AKA "real world"
>>
>> No. Absolutely not. That was a screwup, and it needs to be *rare*. The
>> excuses you present for it are crappy and uunacceptable.
>
> That's not helping. The fact is that is has happened.

It has happened, yes. But we're describing how things *shall* work going
forward. Coping with existing mistakes is a slightly separate issue.
(Albeit only slightly since mistakes *will* continue to happen, but
hopefully more rarely so our defined processes for coping are based on the
assumption that it should be rare)


-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux