On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:30:09PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:05:58PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 13:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > > >> >> Note that you are not describing a normal "DT scenario" here. You are > >> >> describing a case in which we screwed up > >> > > >> > AKA "real world" > >> > >> No. Absolutely not. That was a screwup, and it needs to be *rare*. The > >> excuses you present for it are crappy and uunacceptable. > > > > That's not helping. The fact is that is has happened. > > It has happened, yes. But we're describing how things *shall* work going > forward. Coping with existing mistakes is a slightly separate issue. > (Albeit only slightly since mistakes *will* continue to happen, but > hopefully more rarely so our defined processes for coping are based on the > assumption that it should be rare) Agreed. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpNNEPSg1q6c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
