bump!
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:38 AM Casey Bodley <
cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hey Gal and Eric,
>
> nothing has changed since reef, and we're still using the ancient
> arrow version 6.0.1 for this submodule. can we please choose a more
> recent version and pull up the submodule?
>
> an issue was recently raised in
>
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52629
where the arrow build fails
> due to
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15281
which was fixed in
> arrow 14.0. can we use that?
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Kaleb Keithley <
kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just to expand a bit. For development purposes.
> >
> > As Casey says:
> > + EPEL9 has libarrow-9
> >
> > If you're developing on RHEL8 or CentOS 8:
> > + EPEL8 has libarrow-8 (requires installing subversion-devel module and utf8proc-devel from the module)
> >
> > And if you're developing on Fedora:
> > + Fedora 38 and f39/rawhide are getting libarrow-11 now
> > + Fedora 37 has libarrow-9
> > + Fedora 36 has libarrow-8
> > + Fedora 35 (EOL) has nothing
> >
> > (I originally thought 9, 10, and 11 were released closer together than they actually are. Although 6-8 weeks between them is still a lot of churn IMO. Independent of that, there's still an opportunity to leave Fedora 38 on libarrow-10 if it makes sense
to have libarrow-10 available in a Fedora release.)
> >
> > I dare say "we" could build ORC and Arrow .debs for Ubuntu in a Launchpad PPA. Would that be useful or usable? I.e. could teuthology consume packages from a PPA? (Pretty sure I don't want to own that though. Def don't want to be the only owner of it.)
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:17 PM Casey Bodley <
cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> hey Gal and Eric,
> >>
> >> in today's standup, we discussed the version of our apache arrow
> >> submodule. it's currently pinned at 6.0.1, which was tagged in nov.
> >> 2021. the centos9 builds are using the system package
> >> libarrow-devel-9.0.0. arrow's upstream recently tagged an 11.0.0
> >> release
> >>
> >> as far as i know, there still aren't any system packages for ubuntu,
> >> so we're likely to be stuck with the submodule for quite a while. how
> >> do guys want to handle these updates? is it worth trying to update
> >> before the reef release?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev mailing list --
dev@xxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to
dev-leave@xxxxxxx
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kaleb
