Re: arrow submodule version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hey Gal and Eric,

nothing has changed since reef, and we're still using the ancient
arrow version 6.0.1 for this submodule. can we please choose a more
recent version and pull up the submodule?

an issue was recently raised in
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52629 where the arrow build fails
due to https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15281 which was fixed in
arrow 14.0. can we use that?

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to expand a bit. For development purposes.
>
> As Casey says:
> +  EPEL9 has libarrow-9
>
> If you're developing on RHEL8 or CentOS 8:
> + EPEL8 has libarrow-8 (requires installing subversion-devel module and utf8proc-devel from the module)
>
> And if you're developing on Fedora:
> + Fedora 38 and f39/rawhide are getting libarrow-11 now
> + Fedora 37 has libarrow-9
> + Fedora 36 has libarrow-8
> + Fedora 35 (EOL) has nothing
>
> (I originally thought 9, 10, and 11 were released closer together than they actually are. Although 6-8 weeks between them is still a lot of churn IMO. Independent of that, there's still an opportunity to leave Fedora 38 on libarrow-10 if it makes sense to have libarrow-10 available in a Fedora release.)
>
> I dare say "we" could build ORC and Arrow .debs for Ubuntu in a Launchpad PPA. Would that be useful or usable? I.e. could teuthology consume packages from a PPA? (Pretty sure I don't want to own that though. Def don't want to be the only owner of it.)
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:17 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> hey Gal and Eric,
>>
>> in today's standup, we discussed the version of our apache arrow
>> submodule. it's currently pinned at 6.0.1, which was tagged in nov.
>> 2021. the centos9 builds are using the system package
>> libarrow-devel-9.0.0. arrow's upstream recently tagged an 11.0.0
>> release
>>
>> as far as i know, there still aren't any system packages for ubuntu,
>> so we're likely to be stuck with the submodule for quite a while. how
>> do guys want to handle these updates? is it worth trying to update
>> before the reef release?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux