bump! On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:38 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hey Gal and Eric, > > nothing has changed since reef, and we're still using the ancient > arrow version 6.0.1 for this submodule. can we please choose a more > recent version and pull up the submodule? > > an issue was recently raised in > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52629 where the arrow build fails > due to https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15281 which was fixed in > arrow 14.0. can we use that? > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Just to expand a bit. For development purposes. > > > > As Casey says: > > + EPEL9 has libarrow-9 > > > > If you're developing on RHEL8 or CentOS 8: > > + EPEL8 has libarrow-8 (requires installing subversion-devel module and utf8proc-devel from the module) > > > > And if you're developing on Fedora: > > + Fedora 38 and f39/rawhide are getting libarrow-11 now > > + Fedora 37 has libarrow-9 > > + Fedora 36 has libarrow-8 > > + Fedora 35 (EOL) has nothing > > > > (I originally thought 9, 10, and 11 were released closer together than they actually are. Although 6-8 weeks between them is still a lot of churn IMO. Independent of that, there's still an opportunity to leave Fedora 38 on libarrow-10 if it makes sense to have libarrow-10 available in a Fedora release.) > > > > I dare say "we" could build ORC and Arrow .debs for Ubuntu in a Launchpad PPA. Would that be useful or usable? I.e. could teuthology consume packages from a PPA? (Pretty sure I don't want to own that though. Def don't want to be the only owner of it.) > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:17 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> hey Gal and Eric, > >> > >> in today's standup, we discussed the version of our apache arrow > >> submodule. it's currently pinned at 6.0.1, which was tagged in nov. > >> 2021. the centos9 builds are using the system package > >> libarrow-devel-9.0.0. arrow's upstream recently tagged an 11.0.0 > >> release > >> > >> as far as i know, there still aren't any system packages for ubuntu, > >> so we're likely to be stuck with the submodule for quite a while. how > >> do guys want to handle these updates? is it worth trying to update > >> before the reef release? > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Kaleb _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
