On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 8:04 PM Bernd Zeimetz <bzed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 18:28 +0200, thomas@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > I don't have much time to reply right now, but today, I wrote bug
> > reports to ask for 32 bits removal of Ceph support on the 10 packages
> > that had librbd or librados build-depends. So I agree...
> >
> >
>
> nice, thank you.
>
> I'm actually wondering if krbd should work just fine on 32bit instead
> of librbd? qemu at least supports it, so I think the loss should not
> too bad.
If krbd doesn't work, let me know! Like the rest of Ceph, it's not
tested in 32-bit environments, but, given that krbd is self-contained,
bugs (if any) should be trivial to fix. Owning to being part of the
kernel, I assume that it at least builds cleanly.
If someone wanted to contribute a test to the krbd test suite (e.g.
involving a 32-bit VM image, based on Debian or otherwise), they would
be very much welcome ;)
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
