ceph.spec.in and debian/* changes look reasonable to me.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:47 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the arrow submodule in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696 is
finally building reliably in our CI. i would love some help with
review, especially for the changes under debian/ and ceph.spec.in
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 3:32 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:21 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > after discussion with our Debian/Ubuntu maintainers, we've decided
> > that Ceph will need to build arrow from a submodule for the quincy
> > release. both distros do provide the dependencies necessary for a
> > minimal build of arrow/parquet. i'm working through the cmake
> > integration of the arrow submodule in
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696
> >
> > for Centos, Kaleb has packaged arrow and its missing dependencies and
> > made them available in the Centos Storage SIG
> > (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage). i'm a bit wary
> > about requiring that our Centos users install this additional repo via
> > 'yum install centos-release-ceph', though. the Storage SIG is also
> > going to host Centos' ceph release packages, so it may not a good idea
> > to mix those repos with our upstream download.ceph.com repo
> >
> > getting this stuff into EPEL would be ideal - even if it was just
> > enough to enable us to build the arrow submodule - but it sounds like
> > some obstacles remain here. what do people think about requiring this
> > extra centos-release-ceph repo for quincy? could that be acceptable as
> > a last resort?
>
> utf8proc seems to be the only extra dependency that was missing, so i
> added that as a submodule too. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696
> is building on centos now without any dependency on the Storage SIG
> repo
Kaleb
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
